2006 Mustang GT Vs. 1969 Dodge Charger

  1. Aug 30, 2010 at 08:11 PM by sylentmyst

    @aurorajane1 Yeah, but the old chargers are very heavy

  2. Aug 23, 2010 at 08:33 PM by sfcwoodret

    Mustang whips AZZ AGAIN!

  3. Aug 14, 2010 at 01:44 AM by aurorajane1

    I've had a mustang myself and I know for a fact that there's no way a mustang could beat a charger....it's been tweaked

  4. May 12, 2010 at 08:35 AM by xxomfgboomxx

    The mustang may have won the race but the 69 charger is the real winner

  5. Apr 7, 2010 at 03:28 PM by TheKillerbee13

    thats my friends charger and at the time it was bone stock against a tuned up supercharged mustang.

  6. Mar 19, 2010 at 11:12 AM by adamjamesmandthefrog

    na that should have been Dodge Charger 69 R/T against a 72 Shelby Mustang or 71 Challenger

  7. Jan 22, 2010 at 05:36 PM by GrannyWhackers1217

    that mustang is not stock no doubt

  8. Nov 9, 2009 at 04:41 AM by MetaRevealer

    thats fake..

  9. Oct 9, 2009 at 05:16 PM by magnaflowedramx4

    One friend of mine dropped a 426 HEMI in a '71 Cuda.'ran the 2x4's.and a 5000 RPM stall converter.'sure didn't have a problem racing police cars.Another guy I know had a '69 Road Runner with a .30 over 440 running 12.5 to one. The Javilin that he raced actually got him off the line, but once the RR hit 2nd gear the race was over.

  10. Aug 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM by OldsPowered69

    irwindale ftw!

  11. Jul 3, 2009 at 01:15 AM by Buckboard6300

    the edge is determined sometimes by the hook up that ford hooked the mopar didn't looks like he dos'nt have a 4 link...no use havein power if you can't get it to the ground

  12. Jun 27, 2009 at 01:33 AM by randomguyfromtexas

    well the corvettes were always sports cars in my view light weight 2 seater with a big engine

  13. Jun 11, 2009 at 03:06 PM by macaddict3032

    The old mopars were not much off the line, I owned a couple. Once you got them running, they were tough to beat. The newer stangs are killer off the line, and kinda lose something after about 100 mph. I know I currently own one.

  14. Apr 16, 2009 at 07:46 PM by MajorROOST

    wow, did he fall asleep? the charger driver was so slow off the start. maybe if the charger had a good driver it actually might be a race

  15. Apr 15, 2009 at 06:59 AM by bgkiler

    Maybe Mustang Have 1000 New Parts.....

  16. Apr 12, 2009 at 01:44 AM by JohnTaylorLV

    Hemi Got OWNED.

  17. Apr 11, 2009 at 01:47 AM by pillarstatic

    DEFINITELY not a stock mustang, I hear the supercharger. And the charger driver sucks no matter WHAT engine's in it.

  18. Apr 8, 2009 at 04:08 PM by 41412369

    man that ant no hemi if it had the charger would of one

  19. Mar 13, 2009 at 10:01 AM by Stylenz

    that wasnt a 426 hemi or 440 six pack maybe a 383 or 318 cause if it were the outcome would have been much different or that driver just sucks balls

  20. Mar 6, 2009 at 04:18 PM by reryro11

    the charger is faster than that.

  21. Jan 17, 2009 at 04:33 PM by Zando24

    well, I suppose there is some truth in that yeah.

  22. Jan 11, 2009 at 11:05 PM by xKILLABASSISTx

    no the mustangs are still muscle, the corvettes are the ones that went from muscle to sports car. at least in my opinion.

  23. Jan 11, 2009 at 11:02 PM by xKILLABASSISTx

    yay for stangs...but the old muscle cars were a lot more ballsy.

  24. Jan 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM by xKILLABASSISTx

    the mustang was invented in '64....

  25. Dec 18, 2008 at 01:42 PM by Bourito3

    energetic fun smart and loves this video i cant watch this video Fs

  1. Rating: 16 ratings
    Views: 49,926
    Duration: 0:14
    More Thumbnails:

    Email This Video to a Friend

    Email:

    Message: